夫妇日记

简介：Constantly on the hunt and suffering from hallucinations that drive his violent nature, an unnamed man is capturing women and savagely beating them to death. Meanwhile, a woman is luring men into a violent end, by way of her knife. Driven by the same force to make the opposite sex suffer, the killers’ fates intertwine. The two must face off in a battle to the death, in which they are forced to reveal the horrible truth behind their addiction to murder.　　“Brutal” takes an interesting approach to its visuals, drawing heavy influence from Western “Grindhouse” films, using a filter to make the footage appear grainy, damaged, and with light and color fluctuations. Unfortunately, the visual styling ends up feeling misguided, as other than applying the filter it does not imitate any other aspects of the “Grindhouse” genre. Despite trying to dirty up the film, it is apparent it was shot on digital. The cinematography is also a step above most “Grindhouse” productions, with Takashi Hirose proving he has talent behind the camera. Exterior shots to those taking place in small spaces are all competently framed, lit, and transition well. The decision to add an effect on top of the work hurts the film’s imagery and even gives a sense of desperation to try to capture a certain type of nostalgia with the audience, instead of relying on its own strengths. It is unfortunate when one creative choice can hurt a production so much.　　The story of “Brutal” is simple but effective, it does attempt some sort of social commentary about the violent nature of men and women, but it does not offer enough depth into the subject to justify the amount of violence on display. The film does end on a strong note with an interesting twist, with a reveal that is bound to gross some out, while giving others a chuckle. In spite of its simple nature, those who enjoy films that make them somewhat uncomfortable and enjoy the challenge of getting through some ultra-violence, “Brutal” poses a fun and entertaining challenge in that regard.

简介：三个学生时代的至交老友一起出游济州岛发生的故事。该片将在他们的大学时节和现在穿插叙事。90%的戏份在济州岛取景，5月中旬将在济州岛正式开机。

简介：织田信长被明智光秀刺杀身亡数年后，伺候他的利休当上了信长的继承者丰臣秀吉的茶道首领。利休通过茶水的魅力，笼络了全国的武将，并尽其奢侈，营造了茶道最高府第，京都待庵。即侍候丰臣秀吉的主持僧侣的行宫。构筑了一个利休自己的世界。可是，美梦不长，自石田三成的势力增强以后，秀吉和利休的关系开始出现了激烈的矛盾。起初，利休心爱的徒弟宗二，因冒犯秀吉，被赶出行宫，杀了头。接着，石田三成向秀吉进谗言说“利休对出征朝鲜抱有怀疑”。正巧这时，利休在茶室见到秀吉，不慎谈到出兵朝鲜的事，更加激怒了秀吉。秀吉终于下了一道命令，令利休退出京都，并将他禁闭于大庭院。丰臣秀吉的妻子北政所给利休的妻子利木写了封信，说是利休如果肯认错，她想去乞求秀吉原谅利休。可是，利木的回信只是郑重其事地表示了感谢之外，没说别的事。丰臣秀吉见此信更加生气，命令利休剖腹谢罪。

简介：豪尔（威廉·霍尔登 William Holden 饰）和艾伦（克里夫·罗伯逊 Cliff Robertson 饰）是大学时代的好友，艾伦是衔着金汤匙出生的富家公子，毕业之后，豪尔决定投奔艾伦那个有钱的父亲，希望后者能够给自己提供一份工作。老友相见双方当然都非常的高兴，除了艾伦，豪尔还结识了艾伦的女友梅姬（金·诺瓦克 Kim Novak 饰）。　　梅姬是小镇上最漂亮的女人，豪尔看到她的第一眼就被深深的迷住了，而梅姬也为豪尔幽默的谈吐和绅士风度所倾倒。是选择家境丰厚的未婚夫还是令自己心动的真命天子，梅姬此刻站在人生的交叉路口前。最终，梅姬放弃了理智，追随了内心。

简介：单亲妈妈Holly为了维持生计，成了一名好莱坞皮卡司机，在车里经营黑市医用品。与此同时，她能否逃脱FBI特工的无情追捕？

简介：伟同（赵文瑄）是事业有成的男同志，与男友赛门（Mitchell Lichtenstein）在美国过着幸福的同居日子，烦恼来自要用各种招数应对远在台北的父（郎雄）母（归亚蕾）的一次次逼婚。伟同被逼以“乖乖仔”形象修书一封声称会在美国结婚，没料父母想亲眼见证。无奈，他只得拉上来自上海的不得志的女艺术家葳葳（金素梅）“假婚”，想逃过一劫。　　父母对葳葳相当满意，却对伟同的草率态度不满，为让父母满意尽快返回台北，伟同犹如“拼命三郎”使出了浑身解数。但人算不如天算，不断的波折使得父母的返台日期一次次推迟，令他和赛门的感情亮起“红灯”，而葳葳又意外怀上了他的孩子。似乎，伟同在强大的父母（传统）面前，只能选择去做一个 “表面正常”的男人。

简介：讲述了一个数学天才Nathan（阿沙·巴特菲尔德饰演）因数学天赋而到中国参加一个奥林匹克竞赛，并与一位中国姑娘Zhang Mei(焦阳饰演）产生爱情的故事。　　男主角Nathan是一个有见解的大男孩，但也不必要的与其母亲（莎莉·霍金斯饰演）产生了矛盾。来到中国后，纠结于学业以及爱情之中，讲述了青年人的成长与蜕变。

简介：在两千多年前那个动乱的年代.越王勾践和吴王夫差两个君王之间的生死角斗构成了一幅惊心动魄而又回肠荡气的历史书卷.孟子虽然曾说春秋无义战,但是西施作为一个美女,一个亡国的女奴,周旋于与夫差,勾践,范蠡三个男人的爱恨纠葛之间.她心怀着国仇家恨,肩负着君王的委托,去到吴国,去完成一项本不该由一个女子负担的使命

简介：摄影师増岡（塚本晋也 饰）性格压抑，对人类的恐惧有浓厚的兴趣。一日他凑巧拍下了陌生男子阿礼在地铁刺瞎自己的右眼，増岡反复研究录像，并为实地考察阿礼自残的原因回到现场，他从地铁的设备管道深入地下，惊见已经泯灭的地下文明遗址，并带回一名被锁在遗迹中的赤裸女子。　　増岡称女子为“F”，自此他和F同居一室，并每天工作时借视频手机观察F的举动，F不吃不喝，生命逐渐垂危。増岡偶然发现F吸食血液，于是割伤自己为其续命，不久増岡即发展到杀害陌生女人取血的地步。但F在人类世界难以生存，逐渐麻木的増岡在同F的关系中体味到了真正的恐惧……本片获2005年布鲁塞尔国际幻想电影节金乌鸦奖。

简介：这部B级怪兽电影由《鲨从天降》（Sharknado）的创作人打造，因此和《鲨从天降》一样充满了恶趣味。但是《鲨从天降》中的怪物是大鲨鱼，本片中的怪物却是……小鳗鱼。怪物不分大小，不分形状，只要能在最出人意料的时候发动致命攻击就是好怪物！故事发生在密歇根州的一座小镇，可怕的杀人七鳃鳗闹得当地居民人心惶惶。无论你是去泳池游泳，还是去厕所坐马桶，杀人七鳃鳗随时可能出现，让你稀里糊涂地丢掉性命。七鳃鳗是一种长着巨齿、漏斗状嘴并且能利用细长的身体在城市下水道中自由穿行的鳗鱼。当它们大开杀戒之时，无论你躲在哪里都不安全。下一个受害人会是谁？

简介：Whenever I see La Paura I think of it as a companion piece to Eyes Wide Shut, or maybe it is the other way around. Adultery makes both films tick but in different ways. I think Phillip French was right on the money when he pointed out a Wizard of Oz thing in Kubrick's last work. Like Dorothy, Tom and Nicole go through fantasies and nightmares and at the end Dorothy's reassuring childish motto there's no place like home is ironically updated to the adult circumstantial adage there's no sex like marital sex. Kubrick's take is intellectual, he never leaves the world of ideas to touch the ground. He taunts the audience first with an erotic movie and then with a thriller and refuses to deliver either of them. He was married to his third wife for 40 years, until he died. Rossellini was still married to Ingrid Bergman when he directed La Paura; they had been adulterous lovers and their infidelity widely criticized La Paura is a tale, a noirish one. The noir intrigue is solved and the tale has a happy ending. The city is noir; the country is tale, the territory where childhood is possible. The transition is operated in the most regular way by car, a long-held shot taken from the front of the car as it rides into the road, as if we were entering a different dimension. Irene (Bergman) starts the movie we just see a dark city landscape but her voice-over narration tells us of her angst and informs us that the story is a flashback, hers. Bergman's been cheating on her husband. At first guilt is just psychological torture but soon expands into economic blackmail and then grows into something else. From beginning to end the movie focuses on what Bergman feels, every other character is there to make her feel something. Only when the director gives away the plot before the main character can find out does he want us to feel something Bergman still can't. When she finds out, we have already experienced the warped mechanics of the situation and we may focus once again on the emotional impact it has on Bergman's Irene. In La Paura treasons are not imagined but real, nightmares are deliberate and the couple's venom suppurates in bitter ways. Needless to say, Ingrid has another of her rough rides in the movies but Rossellini doesn't dare put her away as he did in Europa 51, nor does he abandon her to the inscrutable impassivity of nature (Stromboli). His gift is less transcendent and fragile than the conclusion of Viaggio in Italia. He just gives his wife as much of a fairy tale ending as a real woman can have, a human landscape where she can finally feel at home. Back to the country, a half lit interior scene where shadows suggest the comfort of sleep. After all, it's the fairy godmother who speaks the last words in the movie.

简介：故事讲述了美国黑人民权运动中的一桩真实事件，1955年，年仅14岁的埃米特·路易斯·蒂尔被指 责与一名白人妇女有不正当关系后，被绑架并被残忍地杀害。两名白人嫌疑人在全白人陪审团的审判下，被判无罪。埃米特的母亲玛米·蒂尔-莫布利(丹妮尔饰)为了帮儿子伸张正义，决定在埃米特的葬礼上敞开棺材，并让《Jet》杂志刊登自己儿子葬礼照片，她想让世界各地的人们知道她儿子的遭遇。随后成千上万的人看到了埃米特的照片，这也使得埃米特案成为了对南方黑人司法不公的象征。乌比饰演埃米特的祖母阿尔玛·卡尔坦。